New Book Available on Amazon! “The Rapture: Reasons to Believe”

December 31, 2025

This has been such an extremely busy season in my life, so I have had little time to devote to this site. I am, however, thrilled to announce that my latest book is now available on Amazon. It is titled, “The Rapture: Reasons to Believe.” The doctrine of the Rapture is under fire these days. There are those that deny the doctrine altogether. Still, others love to debate and argue about the timing of the Rapture. My book is an apologetic defense of the pre-trib Rapture of the church. Thankfully, eschatology is an area where we can “agree to disagree” if need be. This does not need to be a litmus test for fellowship among true believers.

I’ve divided this book into three sections. The first section deals with the relevant New Testament texts that describe the Rapture. The second section deals with the most commonly held objections to the doctrine. In particular, I go into a deep dive concerning the Olivet Discourse in Matthew 24 and Paul’s second letter to the Thessalonians. These tend to be the key proof-texts of those who deny the pre-trib position. I also deal with the issue of suffering. There are many who accuse pre-tribbers as “escapists” who are unwilling to suffer for the cause of Christ. I will show that this is simply hyperbole and not based on fact. Additionally, I will attempt to show that the pre-trib view is the only one that preserves the doctrine of imminence.

The final section deals with the book of Revelation. The church is mentioned 19 times in the first three chapters of Revelation. Then there is a conspicuous omission of the church until the very end of the book (Rev 22:16, which basically serves as a benediction). We will look at the letters to the 7 churches, the twenty-four elders, the two witnesses, the 144,000, the woman and the dragon, the beast, and finally the Second Coming of Christ (as contrasted with the Rapture of the church). At the end of the book there is an appendix which shows types and shadows of the Rapture in the Old Testament. Admittedly, this may not convince the diehard skeptic. But to those open to listen, they may find compelling reasons to believe in the doctrine of the pre-trib Rapture of the church.

You can order a copy of the book here: https://a.co/d/2tWlSck

Maranatha!

Review of My Book “From Babylon to Beyond”

September 29, 2025

Recently Dr. David Reagan, author and founder of Lamb & Lion Ministries, wrote a review of my book on Daniel’s 70 Weeks prophecy. To say that I am greatly humbled and honored is quite an understatement! I have read many of his books on Bible prophecy and I highly recommend them to you. You can read his review of my book here: https://drdavidreagan.myclickfunnels.com/rails/active_storage/blobs/proxy/eyJfcmFpbHMiOnsibWVzc2FnZSI6IkJBaHBBMDIySHc9PSIsImV4cCI6bnVsbCwicHVyIjoiYmxvYl9pZCJ9fQ==–1425a88ec4bbbe0f4a9cccebc4b1dd7f85adfa2c/Haney%20Booklet.pdf

This has been a very busy season of life, so I haven’t had much time to do writing outside of my normal teaching and sermon prep routine. Thank you for your patience! I hope to produce more quality content in the near future!

Maranatha!

Henry

The Issue of the Sabbath in the Law of Moses

August 4, 2025

In our last entry, we looked at the issue of the Sabbath as it relates to the book of Genesis. Those who teach and preach that Sabbath-keeping is mandatory in the current age, will often appeal to Genesis to prove this is a Creation ordinance. In our last post, we investigated this claim. What we found is that the only One who rested on the seventh day in Genesis was God Himself. Furthermore, the word Sabbath isn’t even used in Genesis. To summarize, the period from Adam to Moses (roughly 2500 years) saw a number of covenants and major events. But there isn’t even one instance of anyone keeping the Sabbath, let alone a commandment to do so!

It isn’t until we get to the book of Exodus that we find our first usage of the Hebrew word shabbat (“sabbath” in English). It’s found in Exodus chapter 16. The context of Exodus 16 deals with the issue of manna. In response to the murmuring and complaining of the Israelites, the LORD provided manna from Heaven. One can detect the Divine sense of humor here because the very name manna means “what is it?” The Israelites were told to gather manna but were given a command not to store/save it for the next day (Ex 16:19). Some did not obey (shocking, I know!), and the result was that the manna bred worms and had a terrible smell. On the sixth day, they gathered twice as much manna (Ex 16:22). After reporting this to Moses we are told this:

Exo 16:23 Then he said to them, “This is what the LORD has said: ‘Tomorrow is a Sabbath rest, a holy Sabbath to the LORD. Bake what you will bake today, and boil what you will boil; and lay up for yourselves all that remains, to be kept until morning.’ ” (NKJV)

(I quoted from the NKJV here, because unfortunately, the KJV translators inserted the definite article (“the”) in front of Sabbath. The original manuscripts contain no definite article. Most all translations since the KJV have corrected this. This is an important detail because the lack of the definite article implies that the concept was previously unknown.)

This is the first mention in the Bible of the concept of sabbath. It must be remembered that they had just left Egypt, where they had been in slavery for over 400 years as a people. They were not accustomed to taking any days off, let alone a weekly sabbath! This is why the LORD gives them an extended explanation of this sabbath concept. The primary content of the command concerned the gathering of manna. They were not to attempt to gather manna on the seventh day. There would actually be none provided by the LORD, it would be an exercise in futility. Nevertheless, some went out on the seventh day and attempted to gather manna, and found none (again, I know you’re shocked).

All of this was a test for the children of Israel (Ex 16:4) to see if they would obey His law. Legalists insist that Christians must obey the Law of Moses for justification and/or sanctification. This episode in Exodus 16 shows that human beings have always had difficulty with God’s laws. That’s true even when they had just crossed the Red Sea on dry land and experienced several subsequent miracles! They would soon receive the Ten Commandments and the rest of the Torah (613 laws to be exact). The outcome will not be much better. Speaking of the Ten Commandments, let’s take a look at the fourth commandment which is a topic of great controversy, even today.

Exo 20:8 Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Exo 20:9  Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: Exo 20:10  But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: Exo 20:11  For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.

The fourth commandment in Exodus 20 begins with the word “remember.” Those that maintain the Sabbath is a requirement from Creation (a Creation ordinance) will say that the command to remember hearkens back to Genesis 2:2-3. That is a problem, however, if you are serious about biblical exegesis. As we have already discussed, the word shabbat or sabbath appears nowhere in Genesis! The first appearance of the word is in Exodus 16. This is the nearest antecedent that would have any point of reference for the children of Israel who had just left Egypt. They are to remember the concept that God had just taught them concerning the gathering of manna on the seventh day. This is also seen in the fact that the fourth commandment is stated in a different way in Deuteronomy.

Deu 5:12 Keep the sabbath day to sanctify it, as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee.

Notice there, the command is simply to keep/observe the Sabbath as opposed to remembering it. The reason for the difference in wording is due to a different context. Deuteronomy is written towards the end of the forty-year period of wandering in the wilderness.

Let’s go back now to the fourth commandment in Exodus 20. They are told to work six days a week, but there is to be a cessation of labor on the seventh day. This rule applied not only to people but also to the domesticated animals. In verse 11, the LORD explains the significance from the Creation account. But it must be noted that even with that being said, the LORD only mentions Himself as having rested on the seventh day. This is beyond the scope of this article, but this is a great apologetics tool to prove that Creation was a literal seven-day period. It should also be noted that there is no command for corporate worship on the Sabbath. There are many groups that insist that worship services are to be held on the Sabbath (which is technically sundown Friday-sundown Saturday). What we will discover is that the Sabbath as it appears in the Law is a call to rest and remain at home on that day.

Though this tends to be a hot topic of controversy, it need not be a test of fellowship or point of contention among true believers. The New Testament urges us not to judge or condemn others regarding the observance of sabbath days or other holidays (Rom 14:5-6, Col 2:16-17).

The Sabbath- An Introduction

August 1, 2025

At https://deepspringschurch.com/ we have been going verse-by-verse through the book of Galatians on Wednesday nights. This week we will be in chapter four of Galatians. Paul reproves the Galatians (who were Gentile Christians) for their slavish observance to the Mosaic calendar (Gal 4:10). Due to the influence of the Judaizers, they believed that adopting selected portions of the Law (which is what the legalist must always do, for they know it’s impossible to keep the entire Torah) would bring them closer to God. I thought it might be helpful for us to take several studies to look at the topic of the Sabbath more in-depth. A book I highly recommend is “The Sabbath” by Dr. Arnold Fruchtenbaum, a Messianic Jew. (You can order the book from Ariel Ministries here https://www.ariel.org/store/product/the-sabbath). I will share some of my thoughts from his book below and in subsequent entries.

To begin with, we must remember that the concept of the Sabbath was not introduced until the book of Exodus. There are many that maintain that Sabbath-keeping is part of a Creation ordinance. What does the book of Genesis tell us about the Sabbath, though?

Gen 2:2  And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. 
Gen 2:3  And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made. 

We read that God rested on the seventh day. There is no mention of the word “Sabbath” whatsoever. It is merely called the seventh day. God hallowed this day. There is no concept of observance here, but rather cessation from work. The emphasis is on rest. And it must be noted that man did not rest on this day, God did! As a matter of fact, there are no mentions of any man keeping the Sabbath from the time period from Adam to Moses (roughly 2500 years!). There is no record of Adam, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, or Job (who many believed lived during the patriarchal period) keeping the Sabbath. This is quite instructive when you consider that there were several covenants made with God and man during this time period.

In Eden, God gave Adam instructions to be fruitful and multiply, have dominion, etc. The only prohibition is that he was forbidden to eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. There was no mention of the Sabbath day (Gen 1:28-30 & Gen 2:15-17). Even after the Fall, Adam isn’t given any instructions regarding the Sabbath day (Gen 3:14-19). After the Flood, Noah receives information regarding capital punishment but isn’t given any instructions regarding the Sabbath (Gen 9:1-17). Abraham eventually receives instructions about circumcision (Gen 17:10) but not until he was already justified before God by faith in Gen 15:6 (some thirteen years earlier!). In all of the passages concerning the Abrahamic covenant (Gen 12:1-7, 13:14-17, 15:1-21, 17:1-21, 22:15-18) there are no commands regarding the Sabbath. If this were a Creation ordinance for man, that’s a rather glaring omission from the text!

In future posts, we will see how the issue of the Sabbath is treated in the Law, the Prophets, the Writings, and the New Testament. If you would like to study along with us in Galatians, the teachings are on our YouTube channel. Just click on the YouTube icon on the right sidebar.

“Sunny Boy” Now Available on Amazon!

May 30, 2025

It’s been a while since my last post. I look forward to updating this site with new content shortly. In the meantime, I’m happy to announce that my second book, “Sunny Boy” is now available on Amazon. Recently, I preached a series of sermons through the book of Judges. I was captivated by the unique story of Samson. This was not my first time preaching on the Samson narratives, but this time I began to observe some details I had previously ignored.

Most of the sermons I have heard regarding Samson portray him solely as a tragic figure. He is typically preached as a handbook for “what-not-to-do.” I will readily admit there are things about Samson none of us should emulate. But I would also caution against “judging Samson” (pardon the pun) before looking at all the evidence. This man lived in a unique period of Israel’s history. In many ways, it was one of the darkest times of the nation. The summary of the time period is found in the last chapter of Judges, and the last verse.

Jdg 21:25  In those days there was no king in Israel: every man did that which was right in his own eyes. 

Samson was uniquely called and anointed by the Holy Spirit. He was given the mammoth task of delivering a group of people who didn’t want to be delivered. In my book, I attempt to highlight some of the challenges Samson faced. Hopefully, the reader will gain fresh perspective on this remarkable man. I hope you will order a copy and leave a kind review if you enjoy it!

Maranatha!

Romans 7 “Dead to the Law”

May 3, 2025

Romans 7 is probably one of the most misunderstood chapters in the New Testament. Paul’s use of personal pronouns (“I”, “me”, “my”) in the chapter cause confusion for some interpreters. We must remember that Paul as a trained rabbi was a master at logic and the usage of analogies. Romans is Paul’s masterpiece, and he has been careful to lay out a logical basis for justification by faith. The first three chapters lay out the need for justification. Since none are righteous, righteousness must come from somewhere (rather Someone!) else. That takes us to Romans 4 & 5. There, Paul lays out the case for justification by faith. He used Abraham (and David) as an example of one who was justified apart from works, apart from rituals (circumcision), and apart from the Law of Moses. After he has made his case for justification by faith, he moves on to sanctification. Hence, the issue of sanctification doesn’t come up until chapter six.

It will be helpful for us to remember at this point, the three tenses of salvation. We will use the letter “P” to help us remember the terminology. Justification is a legal declaration of righteousness. Justification delivers us from the penalty of sin. Sanctification is the middle-tense of salvation. If you’re a believer, that’s where you are right now. Sanctification deals with deliverance from the power of sin. The final tense of our salvation is glorification (we aren’t there yet!). Glorification ensures us deliverance from the presence of sin. Paul will deal with this in chapter 8 of Romans.

In chapter 6, Paul tells us how to be victorious over the power of sin in our lives. This doesn’t mean that we are ever sinless prior to glorification, but ideally, we are “sinning less.” There are three action verbs in Romans six, that are helpful. They are “know”, “reckon”, and “yield.” We must know the truth about our relationship to sin. Paul says that when we were baptized into Christ, we are now dead to sin (Rom 6:2a). Just as Christ was dead, buried, and raised to life, so are we (spiritually). We identify with Him. Our old man was crucified. We are now raised to new life. This spiritual truth is portrayed vividly in the believer’s water baptism. Death is portrayed as the believer goes down into the water. While under the water, the believer identifies with the burial of Christ. As he/she comes up out of the water, there is the symbolism of being raised to new life. We are also told we have to “reckon” this to be true. This word means to consider it to be so, because it is. It’s not enough for us to know this as fact. We must appropriate it in our daily lives. Finally, we are to yield to the Lord. One of the key verses in chapter six is verse 14:

Rom 6:14 For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace.

Chapter six deals with the first half of the verse. Chapter 7 deals with the latter half of the verse. It is there that we begin chapter 7. The issue is the Law. What function (if any) does it have in regard to sanctification? If we may say it this way…chapter 6 tells us how to be sanctified. Chapter 7 tells us how not to be sanctified! There is one glaring omission in chapter 7, and this will be extremely helpful in our exegesis of the passage. You should notice that the topic of the Holy Spirit is conspicuously absent from Romans 7. This is a clue that we are not dealing with the Christian life. Despite what I have read in many commentaries (and countless sermons), Romans 7 does not describe the Christian’s struggle between the flesh and the Spirit (you can find that in Galatians 5). This chapter deals with the struggle between the flesh (sin nature) and the Law! They are vastly different topics and must not be confused!

Rom 7:1  Know ye not, brethren, (for I speak to them that know the law,) how that the law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth? 
Rom 7:2  For the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband. 
Rom 7:3  So then if, while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress: but if her husband be dead, she is free from that law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man. 
Rom 7:4  Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ; that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God. 

In the previous chapter, Paul finished with the analogy of a slave and a master. Now he continues with another analogy. This time, he uses the analogy of marriage. It must be noted here that Paul is not dealing with the issue of marriage, he is using an analogy to explain the believer’s relationship with the Law of Moses. Under the Law, there were no provisions for a woman to initiate a divorce from her husband. She was “bound” to her husband as long as he was alive. Upon his death, however, she was free to be married to another man without committing the sin of adultery. In verse 4, Paul explains the analogy by saying that now the believer is dead to the Law! That’s our relationship with the Law of Moses; we are dead to it! The legalist will object and say, “wait a minute…without the Law won’t that make us sin all the more?” If we were simply separated from the Law, that might be true. But we are not simply dead to the Law, we are married to Another! Now that we are in relationship with Jesus Christ, we can actually bring forth spiritual fruit unto God!

Rom 7:5  For when we were in the flesh, the motions of sins, which were by the law, did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death. 
Rom 7:6  But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter. 

Notice the tense in verse 5. When we were under the law, our sinful passions were aroused and brought forth fruit unto death. Verse 6 begins with “but now”, showing that something has changed. We are now delivered from the law, and free to serve in newness of spirit and not in the oldness of the letter.

The rest of the chapter, Paul is going to make a defense of the law. As he has done in previous verses, he will as a rhetorical question, followed by an emphatic negative.

Rom 7:7  What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.

Paul’s opponents will try to paint him as one who denigrates the Law of Moses. What he will demonstrate however, is that the problem is not with the Law, the problem is with the sin nature (a.k.a. “the flesh” in Christian nomenclature). The function of the law is not to sanctify, but rather to show us what sin really is. By the law is the knowledge of sin (Rom 3:20b). Romans 5:20 makes the shocking statement that the law entered “that the offence might abound.”

We will continue this study in our next post.

God’s “Good News”

April 20, 2025

For my Resurrection Sunday sermon, I preached from the opening greeting of Paul’s letter to the Romans. The first seven verses of Romans comprise one long sentence. We will look at a few individually.

Rom 1:1  Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated unto the gospel of God, 

Paul says three things about himself. It’s interesting that he first refers to himself as a servant (doulos in the Greek which means a bondservant or slave). The Romans would readily understand this term because there were millions of slaves in the Roman empire. It was not something to be desired. The Jews might possibly think of Abraham, Moses, or David who were all called “servants” of the LORD. In any event, Paul saw himself as one indebted to Another who had paid a great price for his soul.

Next, he identified himself as an apostle. There were at least two qualifications for an apostle. An apostle had to have seen the risen Lord (I Cor 9:1). An apostle had to be directly called by the Lord to be an apostle (Acts 9:15, I Cor 15:8). Evidently, the apostles were endowed with the ability to do miraculous signs as well (2 Cor 12:12).

Finally, Paul identifies as one who is separated unto the gospel of God. Paul understood separation. As a Pharisee (the term literally means “separate”) he had been separated unto Judaism and the traditions of the elders. His life was consumed with it. He spent his younger years furiously persecuting the Church (Gal 1:13,14). But, one day he met the risen Lord. When he did, he was no longer separated as a Pharisee, he was separated unto the gospel!

Notice Paul refers to it as the “gospel of God.” The Greek word for gospel is euaggelion (pronounced yoo-ang-ghel’-ee-on). Outside of biblical usage, it was used to announce the victory of a sovereign or the arrival of a new king. The word literally means “good news.” But this is not any ordinary news… it’s God’s Good News!

Rom 1:2  (Which he had promised afore by his prophets in the holy scriptures,) 

The next thing Paul discloses, is that the Gospel is not “new news”, it was all over the Old Testament scriptures. Psalm 2:7 and Proverbs 30:4 revealed that God has a Son. The coming of a redeemer was first disclosed in the Garden of Eden (Gen 3:15). God told Abraham that in him all the families of the earth would be blessed (Gen 12:3). David predicted that the Messiah would be crucified (Psa 22) and that the Messiah would rise from the dead (Psa 16:10). Isaiah predicted that the Messiah would suffer, die, be buried in a rich man’s tomb, and rise again! (Isa 52-53)

Rom 1:3  Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh;

Paul says that this “Good News” is all concerning, or about God’s Son, Jesus Christ our Lord! All of the Old Testament scriptures pointed to Jesus. Christ revealed this to His apostles after the resurrection (Luke 24:27). All of the types and shadows, the blood sacrifices, the feasts, they all pointed to the finished work of Christ.

Paul then speaks of Christ’s humanity. He was fully God and fully man. He was a descendant of King David. The New Testament opens with Jesus Christ’s connection to David (Matt 1:1) and it ends with the same (Rev 22:16). God had promised David that one of his descendants would be an Eternal Son who would reign forever (2 Sam 7:12-13). In His humanity, Jesus came in meekness and was crucified and buried. When He comes again to rule and reign, it will be much different!

Rom 1:4  And declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead:

Notice that Paul said Christ was “declared” to be the Son of God. He didn’t “become” the Son of God at the resurrection, but He was declared as such with power. Jesus had already revealed that no man had the power to take His life from Him.

John 10:17  Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again. 
John 10:18  No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father. 

John records an event at the first Passover of Jesus’ ministry. In Jerusalem He cleansed the Temple, which had become a corrupt place of merchandise. The religious leaders were indignant and demanded that Jesus provide a sign to show His authority to do such things. He made a curious statement.

John 2:19  Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up. 

As is typical in the Gospel of John, the people misunderstood spiritual things and confused them with natural. They thought He was talking about Herod’s Temple. But He was talking about His own body! So, when He rose from the grave that was a powerful declaration of His Deity. Evidently, the chief priests and Pharisees finally figured it out and took the issue seriously. This we read at the end of Matthew’s Gospel:

Mat 27:62  Now the next day, that followed the day of the preparation, the chief priests and Pharisees came together unto Pilate, 
Mat 27:63  Saying, Sir, we remember that that deceiver said, while he was yet alive, After three days I will rise again. 

They requested the tomb be made secure, sealed, and guarded with Roman soldiers. Even that wasn’t enough to stop the Son of God from coming out of that tomb victorious! Over 500 people saw Jesus in a resurrected body (I Cor 15:6). That kind of eyewitness testimony would stand in any legitimate court of law! All the religious leaders had to do was produce a corpse. That would have stopped the movement immediately, and Jesus of Nazareth would have vanished into history as an imposter. Instead, His followers would turn the world upside down…before most of them died a martyr’s death. His “Good News” would go into all the world as it is today. Have you received and believed God’s Good News? I’ll leave you with the words of the apostle.

1Co 15:1  Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; 
1Co 15:2  By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. 
1Co 15:3  For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 
1Co 15:4  And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: 

Separated Unto the Gospel

April 15, 2025

Rom 1:1 Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated unto the gospel of God,

This is Paul’s initial greeting to the Church at Rome. He identifies himself as a servant of Jesus Christ before his calling as an apostle. There is much that could be said about both roles. Instead, I want to direct your attention to his separation. I think we often associate separation with being separated “from” something. This is most common when speaking of relationships. It can also be true in a religious sense. There are many who view separation in negative terms. To be honest, there are times when we need to separate ourselves from those who are not leading us closer to Christ. There are times when churches (or whole denominations) depart from biblical truth, and we must separate to maintain doctrinal purity.

There is also an unhealthy separation. This is a separation that leads to isolation. Paul would be keenly aware of such a separation. He was a part of a religious group called the Pharisees (Phil 3:5). If you look up “Pharisee” in the dictionary, you will discover the etymology of the word literally means “separated.” Their beginnings in the intertestamental period may have been noble, but by the time of Christ they had become corrupt. Their traditions had taken priority over God’s Word. They were disgusted by Jesus’ grace and mercy extended to “sinners.” This often happens when we forget our humble beginnings. If we are not careful, we will begin to identify ourselves by “what we don’t do” (or “what we do”) instead of acknowledging God’s grace in our own lives. Spiritual pride leads to elitism and isolationism.

Paul wasn’t just separated “from” his former life. He was separated “unto” something much greater. In his case, it was the gospel of God. The Greek word for separated is aphorizō and it’s where we get our English word “horizon.” When Paul was apprehended by Christ, he gained a whole new horizon! At one time, he lived to persecute the Church. Now, he lived to share God’s “Good News” (that’s what gospel means). Almost all Bible commentators take note of three great “separations” in Paul’s life. They are as follows:

  1. From his mother’s womb (Gal 1:15)
  2. From the world (Acts 9:15)
  3. For the work the Holy Spirit called him to (Acts 13:2)

Paul was uniquely chosen before birth for a special task. He met the Lord on the Damascus Road and gained new life. In Antioch, he was separated by the Holy Spirit to begin missionary work.

You and I aren’t apostles. Our conversion likely wasn’t as dramatic as Paul’s. We may never hear audible words of the Spirit guiding us into ministry. But let us never forget that we have been separated from an old life of sin and death. We have also been separated unto a brand-new horizon! We too, are carriers of God’s Good News!

Grace or Debt? (Romans 4:4-8)

March 26, 2025

We continue to look at Paul’s exposition of justification by faith in today’s post. Paul has already cited the example of Abraham as one who was justified apart from works. Abraham is revered as the “father of faith” and now we will look at David as “Israel’s greatest king.” The one is famous for his faith and righteousness, the other infamous for a few great sins. It’s interesting that Paul chooses David’s failures rather than his great victories to make his point. Let’s see if we can follow Paul’s logic.

Rom 4:4  Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt. 

We see again Paul’s use of the word logizomai (translated as “reckoned” in the KJV). This is pretty straightforward. When one works and receives their wages, no grace is involved. After a 40-hour week you receive your paycheck. You may be thankful and love your job, but this is hardly considered a gracious act by your employer. You simply receive what you’ve earned. You were given what was owed to you. Grace is something altogether different.

Rom 4:5  But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.

Here is the language of grace. Abraham didn’t work for his righteousness, he simply believed in the LORD. On that basis, righteousness was “counted” (again “logizomai” in Greek) or credited to Abraham’s account. What may seem shocking at first glance is that we discover those who are justified. It’s not the godly, but rather, the ungodly! Those familiar with the Old Testament may immediately recall such scriptures as these:

Exo 23:7  Keep thee far from a false matter; and the innocent and righteous slay thou not: for I will not justify the wicked. 

Deu 25:1  If there be a controversy between men, and they come unto judgment, that the judges may judge them; then they shall justify the righteous, and condemn the wicked. 

The great expositor Warren Wiersbe remarked that “God justifies the ungodly-because there are no godly for Him to justify!”. Paul has already resolved this dilemma for us back in chapter 3 when he declared that God “set forth” Christ to be a propitiation for the remission of sins (Rom 3:25). Because Christ bore our sins on the Cross, God can now apply His righteousness to our account when we believe.

Rom 4:6  Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works,

Now Paul turns to David to strengthen the argument. Using the biblical principle of two witnesses, we now have an example from the law and the prophets/writings. Abraham’s faith was reckoned as righteousness by grace. Now we are going to see grace given to David apart from works. To make his point, Paul is going to quote from Psalm 32:1-2.

Rom 4:7  Saying, Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered. 
Rom 4:8  Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin. 

To fully appreciate this, you must be familiar with the Old Testament and David’s story in particular. Most scholars believe that David penned this Psalm after his encounter with Nathan the prophet in 2 Samuel chapter 12. David had committed adultery with Bathsheba. She became pregnant, and David conspired to have her husband Uriah killed (Uriah is memorialized in Matthew’s genealogy of Christ in Matt 1:6). At least nine months later, God sent Nathan the prophet to confront David concerning his sins. I would encourage you to read the whole story in 2 Samuel 11 and 12, but for sake of time I will only cite this one reference here.

2Sa 12:13  And David said unto Nathan, I have sinned against the LORD. And Nathan said unto David, The LORD also hath put away thy sin; thou shalt not die.

David had committed at least two capital crimes (adultery and murder). Under the Law of Moses, there were no sacrifices for such willful sins. One could only expect the penalty of death. All David could do was cast himself upon the mercies of God. And look what happened…not only did God forgive David’s sin, He pardoned him from the death penalty! No wonder David’s heart erupted with praise to God in Psalm 32!

Paul has now given two great examples from the Old Testament showing righteousness apart from works. Abraham received what he did not deserve, and David didn’t get what he truly did deserve! You can either ask the LORD for a fair trial (bad idea!), or you can plead guilty and ask God for mercy. Because of what Christ did at Calvary, you and I can be righteous apart from works. I like to call that the “Great Exchange.”

2Co 5:21  For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him

Where is Boasting? (Romans 4:1-3)

March 25, 2025

In Romans 4, Paul is making the case for justification by faith. He will use two Old Testament examples to solidify his argument. He begins with Abraham.

Rom 4:1  What shall we say then that Abraham our father, as pertaining to the flesh, hath found? 
Rom 4:2  For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God. 

In Judaism, Abraham is held in the highest regard. As a matter of fact, three of the world’s largest religions trace their roots to Abraham. God promised in Genesis 12:2 that He would make Abraham’s name great, and history has vindicated this. The rabbis have such a high view of Abraham that some had the impression that he was justified by his good works. We can look back at Abraham’s offering of Isaac as the supreme example of obedience and he is known as “the friend of God.” (2 Chron 20:7, James 2:23).

But this is not what Paul chooses to focus on. Let’s follow his train of thought.

Rom 4:3  For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.

The first question is of the utmost importance. It doesn’t matter what our opinions are, or even the opinions of those held in high esteem. But what do the scriptures say about the subject? That’s what matters! So, Paul directs us to Genesis 15 for the answer.

Gen 15:6  And he believed in the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness.

This is the first mention of “belief” in the scriptures. This is not by accident; this is by design. People often wonder how folks were saved under the Old Covenant. My answer is, “the same way they are in the New Covenant.” People are saved by grace, through faith! Paul uses Abraham (the “father of faith”) to make this point. Abraham was not righteous because of his good deeds. He was declared to be righteous because he believed in the LORD!

The major theme of Romans is “the righteousness of God.” This is a righteousness that is bestowed upon us, apart from any goodness in us. Paul spends the first three chapters of Romans proving that the whole world is guilty before God and there are none righteous…no not one! The key word in Romans chapter 4 is the Greek word logizomai. The word is used 11 times in chapter 4. The KJV translators chose to translate this in a myriad of ways. They translated logizomai using the words, “counted”, “reckoned”, and “impute(d).” Those are all accurate ways to translate the word, but in my humble opinion, they obscure the argument Paul is trying to make. The NASB (New American Standard Bible) sought to alleviate this issue by the consistent translation of logizomai as “credited.”

Abraham believed God, and on that basis, righteousness was credited to him. “Credited” has more of a financial connotation whereas “imputed” carries more of a legal connotation, but both are accurate. Righteousness was “credited” to Abraham’s account. The reason Abraham can’t boast of his good works as a means of justification is because the righteousness was not his own! This righteousness was placed on his account, not because of works but because of faith! We will develop this further in our next post. Thanks for reading!